-
QUECLINK LAUNCHES COMPACT DMS CAMERA SOLUTION FOR ADVANCED DRIVER MONITORING - 11 hours ago
-
CTRACK AND ARTURA JOIN FORCES TO LAUNCH TELEMATICS-ENABLED ACCIDENT AND REPAIR SOLUTION - April 28, 2025
-
GOPLASTICPALLETS.COM CELEBRATES MONUMENTAL 2,000 TONNE RECYCLING MILESTONE - April 24, 2025
-
LSA INTERNATIONAL CHOOSES PROLOG FULFILMENT TO MANAGE ITS DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS - April 23, 2025
-
Uniserve Partners with Logistics Reply to Deliver Transformation to Customers Supply Chains - April 23, 2025
-
Nutrivend selects Forterro’s Orderwise to support online expansion and streamline operations - April 11, 2025
-
ARROWXL LAUNCHES AMBITIOUS ZERO WASTE ROADMAP - April 8, 2025
-
THE BCMPA’S NEW CAMPAIGN DRIVES OUTSOURCING SUCCESS IN Q1 - April 7, 2025
-
BLACKOUT TECHNOLOGIES TARGETS TELEMATICS-INTEGRATED MOBILE DEVICE BLOCKING TO COMBAT SMARTPHONE DISTRACTION - April 1, 2025
-
OpenADR Alliance announces first OpenADR 3.0 certified products with EVoke Systems, E.ON Energy and Universal Devices - March 25, 2025
Freight Forwarders Warned Not To Expect Compensation For Felixstowe Disruption.
Freight forwarders that suffered operational damage and incurred significant additional costs as a result of the disruption to operations at the UK port of Felixstowe following the introduction of a new operating system in June have been warned that they are unlikely to receive any compensation from the port’s owners.
Robert Keen, Director General of the British International Freight Association (BIFA) said:
“Having had a meeting with the port’s senior management, it is clear that the only companies that might receive any compensation are shipping lines.
“The port authority has made it clear to us that it does not consider BIFA members to be direct customers of the port, and would not be willing to have a discussion about possible compensation for the damage caused and the increased costs that have been incurred by those members.
“It is astonishing that a port authority, which owns the UK’s busiest container port and has been happy to market it as the ‘Port of Britain’, implemented a new and vitally important system with apparently no fall-back position if it went wrong.
“And it is very disappointing that it is not even prepared to discuss any kind of compensation for such a failure in customer service.”